Peer Review Process
ICACSIS employs double blind reviewing, where both the reviewer and author remain anonymous throughout the process.
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript :Is original
Is methodologically sound
Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
Correctly references previous relevant work
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.
Decision of the manuscript
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers, and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.
Director's Decision is final
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article
No show Policy
Papers that are not presented in the conference will not be included in the final Proceeding
Archive Access Policy
The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.